This article I found when skimming the news today makes me laugh. AT&T is falling apart at the seams. The iPhone's handcuff with AT&T is likely limited, but that is all that AT&T has when trying to attack Verizon.
On a separate rant, while the iPhone has some bad-ass features, I'm still not convinced that Apple is capable of making a reliable phone (Keyword: Phone). While AT&T's network certainly deserves part of the blame for iPhone customer complaints, Apple's inability to deliver a quality phone device should receive more attention (poor voice and sound quality). Oh, I forgot, Apple is looked at as the tech God. No matter what they come up with, the world loves it and marks it as the best thing ever. Does anyone truly review Apple products or just assume they are the benchmark? Got to hand it to Steve Jobs, though. His company does a great job marketing their products and the success of the iPod has made his company the benchmark in every device that they produce (whether or not they deserve that distinction). Does the world forget that their products are severely overpriced? Of course not.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Is AT&T Dumb?
AT&T just filed a lawsuit against Verizon regarding Verizon's new "There's a map for that" commercials. The commercials aim directly at AT&T's 3G coverage (or lack thereof). AT&T claims that the ads misrepresent the company's cell phone coverage. AT&T claims that some consumers view the ads and falsely believe that the featured AT&T maps are that of total wireless coverage, not 3G coverage. Are you kidding AT&T? You must be desperate. Look at this Youtube video of the commercial. It clearly says below every map displayed that the map is representative of 3G coverage. Expect this lawsuit to be dismissed.
Follow-up: A judge ruled that Verizon can continue to produce and air these AT&T attack ads. Is that a surprise to anyone? AT&T, you are dumb.
Follow-up: A judge ruled that Verizon can continue to produce and air these AT&T attack ads. Is that a surprise to anyone? AT&T, you are dumb.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Weekend of Revenge
To Those in Possession of PSU/Iowa Tickets,
This is our weekend of revenge. This is the game where we pay Iowa back for destroying our undefeated season a year ago. College Gameday will be just outside the BJC. It will be a Whiteout night game in Beaver Stadium, the best venue in college football. I am writing to you with the hope that you are the 12th and 13th man for our team on Saturday night. I expect an environment no less than that faithful October night in 2005 against the Buckeyes. I want Beaver Stadium to be rocking. I want to get chills down my spine when I hear the Nittany Lion faithful screaming through my television set. I want to feel your energy. I want you to remind the college football world that PSU has the best fans, the best student section and the loudest stadium in college football. As a PSU alumnus and current resident of Iowa, make me proud.
For the Glory,
Swiggs
This is our weekend of revenge. This is the game where we pay Iowa back for destroying our undefeated season a year ago. College Gameday will be just outside the BJC. It will be a Whiteout night game in Beaver Stadium, the best venue in college football. I am writing to you with the hope that you are the 12th and 13th man for our team on Saturday night. I expect an environment no less than that faithful October night in 2005 against the Buckeyes. I want Beaver Stadium to be rocking. I want to get chills down my spine when I hear the Nittany Lion faithful screaming through my television set. I want to feel your energy. I want you to remind the college football world that PSU has the best fans, the best student section and the loudest stadium in college football. As a PSU alumnus and current resident of Iowa, make me proud.
For the Glory,
Swiggs
Friday, September 11, 2009
Remember 9/11
Today is the 8th anniversary of the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks that brought down the iconic Twin Towers, took thousands of American lives and damaged God knows how many families. I'll never, ever forget where I was that morning. I was a sophomore in high school sitting in my second period class when my teacher flipped on the TV. The first plane had struck the first tower. As we continued to watch the news coverage, I saw the second plane hit live. Needless to say, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. I'll never forget the sight of seeing the towers collapse. It'll stay with me forever.
Today I pray for the thousands that lost their lives and the families they left behind. Today I remember the heros of Flight 93. They stood up to the hyjackers and likely saved hundreds, if not thousands of lives. Today I salute the members of the New York City Fire Department and the brave firefighters who lost their lives. Your sacrifice will not be forgotten.
Today I pray for the thousands that lost their lives and the families they left behind. Today I remember the heros of Flight 93. They stood up to the hyjackers and likely saved hundreds, if not thousands of lives. Today I salute the members of the New York City Fire Department and the brave firefighters who lost their lives. Your sacrifice will not be forgotten.
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Halftime Update -- Titans at Steelers
The bad first....Ugly defensive struggle. Well, the Titans defense is holding their own. The Steeler defense looks porous. The Steeler offense has been completely anemic in the first half. The running game continues to be absent and the passing game can't seem to gain any momentum. Meanwhile, the Steeler defense is playing marginal. Kerry Collins throws short, underneath passes 80% of the time against the Steelers, but the defense can't adjust. James Harrison and Lamar Woodley have been neutralized by the solid line play of the Titans. Despite 3 big first half penalties on Troy Polamalu, he has been all over the field. He's made some great tackles in addition to making a nice one-handed interception off Collins. By the way, I can't believe the zebras have missed all the holding by the Titans offensive line. James Harrison has literally been dragged to the ground on multiple occasions. Makes me sick. Anyway...
Ben looked rusty for the majority of the half. His timing was off and he took a couple of bad sacks. Midway through the first quarter, Ben took an 18 yard sack that knocked the Steelers out of field goal range. I understand that Ben likes to hold the ball in order to make a play, but sometimes you have to realize that when the play is dead, you have to throw the ball away and take the chance at points. Willie Parker has been completely ineffective. The offensive line isn't opening up any holes. Rashard Mendenhall has been used sparingly and has not been a factor. The only bright spot for the Steeler offense has been Santonio Holmes and Heath Miller. Both have made a couple of nice catches in traffic.
In the 2 minutes drill at the end of the half, the Steeler offense finally came alive. Ben's passes and pump fakes were sharp hitting a long reception over the middle to Hines Ward. Two plays later, Ben connected with a 34 yard touchdown pass to Super Bowl MVP Santonio Holmes. Maybe the rhythm of that drive can carry over to the second half.
Coming right back at the end of the half was the Titans. The Steeler defense again looked miserable. They're getting torn apart by Kerry Collins, who seems to own the Steelers. The Steeler rush can't get to Collins and he's making us pay. I don't know what it is about the Titans offense. They always give us problems and Dick LeBeau has got to find an answer or it's game over, especially with the struggles of the Steeler offense.
Ben looked rusty for the majority of the half. His timing was off and he took a couple of bad sacks. Midway through the first quarter, Ben took an 18 yard sack that knocked the Steelers out of field goal range. I understand that Ben likes to hold the ball in order to make a play, but sometimes you have to realize that when the play is dead, you have to throw the ball away and take the chance at points. Willie Parker has been completely ineffective. The offensive line isn't opening up any holes. Rashard Mendenhall has been used sparingly and has not been a factor. The only bright spot for the Steeler offense has been Santonio Holmes and Heath Miller. Both have made a couple of nice catches in traffic.
In the 2 minutes drill at the end of the half, the Steeler offense finally came alive. Ben's passes and pump fakes were sharp hitting a long reception over the middle to Hines Ward. Two plays later, Ben connected with a 34 yard touchdown pass to Super Bowl MVP Santonio Holmes. Maybe the rhythm of that drive can carry over to the second half.
Coming right back at the end of the half was the Titans. The Steeler defense again looked miserable. They're getting torn apart by Kerry Collins, who seems to own the Steelers. The Steeler rush can't get to Collins and he's making us pay. I don't know what it is about the Titans offense. They always give us problems and Dick LeBeau has got to find an answer or it's game over, especially with the struggles of the Steeler offense.
The End of American Idol
I was shocked this morning to see that Ellen DeGeneres was selected to replace Paula Abdul on American Idol. All this proves to me is that show is becoming more and more of a popularity contest. As much as I like Ellen, what does she know about music? How can she, a talk show host/comedian, judge a musical candidate and give meaningful feedback on his/her voice. This is not a good thing for the legitimacy of the show. Just a couple of months ago, a former contestant on the show raised concerns about the voting, claiming it was all fixed. Although he had no proof to back his allegations, it's still something that should be considered after the "lock" to win Idol last year wound up finishing second.
With Paula gone and a music outsider joining the judge panel, American Idol is moving closer to ratings and entertainment and farther from finding raw musical talent. Either Paula's exit or Simon Fuller's new hire indicates the beginning of the end for American Idol.
With Paula gone and a music outsider joining the judge panel, American Idol is moving closer to ratings and entertainment and farther from finding raw musical talent. Either Paula's exit or Simon Fuller's new hire indicates the beginning of the end for American Idol.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
PSU Receivers Set Up
Entering the 2009 Penn State football season, lots was made of how the PSU receiving corps would likely be a weakness. Granted, Penn State lost multi-year starters Deon Butler, Derrick Williams and Jordon Norwood. However, Penn State fans need not look far to understand that coming into the 2009 season, the receivers are not the weakness that many might have expected. Let's turn the clock back to 2005. Penn State was coming off an atrocious 4-7 campaign. The offense was the glaring weakness in 2004. The 2005 team had an offensive rejuvenation where the receiving corps was led by 3 true freshman. Being true freshman, those 3 guys (named above) obviously had no collegiate football experience. The 2005 season yielded an 11-1 record, a Big Ten Championship and an Orange Bowl victory.
Fast forward back to 2009. Is it so inconceivable that the 2009 PSU receivers can produce at a level provided by the "big three" from 2005? I have argued this offseason that we are in better shape at receiver in 2009 than we were during our 11-1 campaign in 2005. This year, we return game experience as well as a dimension that was missing from our departed seniors, height. In the first game of the 2009 season, Daryl Clark passed for 353 yards and new receivers Derek Moye, Chaz Powell and Graham Zug had 138, 65 and 62 yards receiving respectively (all 3 receivers had a TD reception). That's an impressive debut for 3 players that were supposed to be a weak link.
I know the national media needs story lines for every team, but a position of weakness coming into this season should not have been the wide receivers. They all may be new starters, but they are not new to the collegiate level. Also, don't under estimate the advantage of having Daryl Clark as the signal caller. He was the Big Ten's top QB from a year ago and provides a strong sense a leadership to the new wide receivers. Although Michael Robinson was a great leader throughout the 2005 run, he was also not a seasoned starter when he took control of the offense in '05.
I expect great contributions from the PSU receiving corps throughout the 2009 season. Their debut against Akron did not leave me disappointed. What did leave me disappointed was a sub-par second half and only 136 team rushing yards. The offensive line has to step up.
Fast forward back to 2009. Is it so inconceivable that the 2009 PSU receivers can produce at a level provided by the "big three" from 2005? I have argued this offseason that we are in better shape at receiver in 2009 than we were during our 11-1 campaign in 2005. This year, we return game experience as well as a dimension that was missing from our departed seniors, height. In the first game of the 2009 season, Daryl Clark passed for 353 yards and new receivers Derek Moye, Chaz Powell and Graham Zug had 138, 65 and 62 yards receiving respectively (all 3 receivers had a TD reception). That's an impressive debut for 3 players that were supposed to be a weak link.
I know the national media needs story lines for every team, but a position of weakness coming into this season should not have been the wide receivers. They all may be new starters, but they are not new to the collegiate level. Also, don't under estimate the advantage of having Daryl Clark as the signal caller. He was the Big Ten's top QB from a year ago and provides a strong sense a leadership to the new wide receivers. Although Michael Robinson was a great leader throughout the 2005 run, he was also not a seasoned starter when he took control of the offense in '05.
I expect great contributions from the PSU receiving corps throughout the 2009 season. Their debut against Akron did not leave me disappointed. What did leave me disappointed was a sub-par second half and only 136 team rushing yards. The offensive line has to step up.
Monday, August 24, 2009
CIA Interrogations
I am all for tough interrogation techniques. Today, a report is suspected to made public that details abuse and "questionable" interrogation techniques within CIA prisons. Allegedly, the CIA used a gun and electric drill to scare a suspected terrorist into giving up information. I want to know if it worked. Terrorists will stop at nothing when it comes to harming the United States and their citizens. Obtaining information from these extremists is a very important step in stopping them from carrying out more attacks. If the CIA needs to scare the prisoner in an attempt to make him talk, I say do it! What's the point in even interrogating a known terrorist if you're not willing to use advanced interrogation techniques? Do you think these guys are just going to roll over and say "Well, I've been caught so I have to do what they say now". Hell no! If their hands are not forced, I'm willing to bet they just sit there silently. These terrorists are not dumb people and they've been trained and brainwashed to hate the US and its Allies. They're not going to willingly give up information that will aid their enemies.
While some people may focus on the interrogation methods when this report is released, I'll be wondering how well it worked. I'll be wondering how many lives were saved based on the information that was obtained. I'll be wondering how much the US has learned about the inner workings and dealings of terrorist organizations. That's the part I'll focus on.
While some people may focus on the interrogation methods when this report is released, I'll be wondering how well it worked. I'll be wondering how many lives were saved based on the information that was obtained. I'll be wondering how much the US has learned about the inner workings and dealings of terrorist organizations. That's the part I'll focus on.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Arrogance with a Touch of Stupidity
Michael Crabtree, the former Texas Tech wide receiver was selected 10th overall by the 49er's in the NFL draft this past April. Training camp has officially started across the NFL and Crabtree has yet to sign a contract. He also missed all off-season workouts and has not participated with the team since draft day. Crabtree says he is prepared to sit out the coming season and re-enter the NFL draft because he wants a fair market value contract. What a bunch of shit!
These NFL rookies are unbelieveably arrogant. They haven't played one down in the NFL and they expect to receive top dollar. The list of high draft picks that have completely busted at the next level is endless. Yet, these just-out-of-college hotshots believe they should be the highest paid players in the NFL. Please. I realize the NFL is a business and this is their career, but football is also a game. These guys get to play a game for a living and get paid millions to do so. I say %&$# you if you can't live off $30 million over a 5 year contract. I'd work in a Sewage plant covered in shit for 10 hours a day for the rest of my life if it got me $6 million/year. These guys get to play a game and are complaining.
I hope Mr. Crabtree doesn't sign a contract. I hope he sits out the season and I hope he re-enters the draft. Odds are complete against success if he goes that direction. Maybe he gets more money next year as a result, but he would have been away from competitive football for a year and a half. That's not something that will get NFL owners excited and it certainly won't help his performance. His arrogance makes me hope he fails at the NFL level and 10 years from now when he wises up, he will realize that he passed on millions of dollars per year out of greed. Maybe it's not all Michael's fault as his agent can't escape without receiving some of the blame. Sports agents have the morals and ethics of the Enron executives currently rotting in prison. All they see are dollar signs and I believe they contribute extensively to the mind-poisioning of young athletes.
I applaud the (what seems like a small number) athletes out there that play their respective sport because they just love the game. Never in their career have they let money come between them and the game they love. Props to you.
As far as Mr. Crabtree and his "I don't give a shit about my client's career, all I want is money" agent, you best get a contract signed and get your behind into 49er's training camp ASAP. Otherwise, your arrogance may just cost you a lifetime of wealth and success.
These NFL rookies are unbelieveably arrogant. They haven't played one down in the NFL and they expect to receive top dollar. The list of high draft picks that have completely busted at the next level is endless. Yet, these just-out-of-college hotshots believe they should be the highest paid players in the NFL. Please. I realize the NFL is a business and this is their career, but football is also a game. These guys get to play a game for a living and get paid millions to do so. I say %&$# you if you can't live off $30 million over a 5 year contract. I'd work in a Sewage plant covered in shit for 10 hours a day for the rest of my life if it got me $6 million/year. These guys get to play a game and are complaining.
I hope Mr. Crabtree doesn't sign a contract. I hope he sits out the season and I hope he re-enters the draft. Odds are complete against success if he goes that direction. Maybe he gets more money next year as a result, but he would have been away from competitive football for a year and a half. That's not something that will get NFL owners excited and it certainly won't help his performance. His arrogance makes me hope he fails at the NFL level and 10 years from now when he wises up, he will realize that he passed on millions of dollars per year out of greed. Maybe it's not all Michael's fault as his agent can't escape without receiving some of the blame. Sports agents have the morals and ethics of the Enron executives currently rotting in prison. All they see are dollar signs and I believe they contribute extensively to the mind-poisioning of young athletes.
I applaud the (what seems like a small number) athletes out there that play their respective sport because they just love the game. Never in their career have they let money come between them and the game they love. Props to you.
As far as Mr. Crabtree and his "I don't give a shit about my client's career, all I want is money" agent, you best get a contract signed and get your behind into 49er's training camp ASAP. Otherwise, your arrogance may just cost you a lifetime of wealth and success.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Apple "Tablet" PC
The tech grapevine says that Apple has a netbook, or tablet PC, in the makes. If these photos are accurate, this looks like another stellar device from Apple. Currently, their touch screen technology beats out any others that I have seen. That makes me believe that this device has the potential to essentially be an iPod on steriods. Given the success of the iPod, that could spell good things for Apple.
But here is the million dollar question...what ridiculous price will Apple charge? I'm willing to bet the farm that it will be another beautiful product from Apple that is out of reach to the average American. This is another Apple product that catches my eye, but unless it's released at a reasonable price point, Apple loses another potential customer. Are you listening Mr. Jobs?
But here is the million dollar question...what ridiculous price will Apple charge? I'm willing to bet the farm that it will be another beautiful product from Apple that is out of reach to the average American. This is another Apple product that catches my eye, but unless it's released at a reasonable price point, Apple loses another potential customer. Are you listening Mr. Jobs?
Monday, August 3, 2009
Business Ethics?
Apple is a company that many people seem to drool over. Exhibit A being Justine Ezarik. I admit, they make some great products, but what is with the obsession? Apple fanboys and fangals seem to see only the good side of Apple. In this article from Foxnews.com, you can read about Apple's violation of business ethics. Ethics aren't "law" in the business world, but as a responsible company, ethics are extremely important. I have a major problem when companies breach the fine line of business ethics.
In the case of Apple and the so-called exploding iPod, Apple should have issued a refund with no questions asked. They should have then re-acquired the iPod for testing to ensure that this was an isolated incident. Issuing a refund only on the condition of a gag order? That's unethical and poor business practice.
In the case of Apple and the so-called exploding iPod, Apple should have issued a refund with no questions asked. They should have then re-acquired the iPod for testing to ensure that this was an isolated incident. Issuing a refund only on the condition of a gag order? That's unethical and poor business practice.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
It's All Your Fault
As a follow-up to my Apple's Stupidity blog entry, check out this ridiculous claim from Apple. Even if this is true, it's all your fault Apple. You made a fantastic phone and limited it to one, lousy wireless network. Therefore, you should have known that hackers would figure out a way to get around it. If the "jailbreaked" iPhones really could cause a problem then I say it's all your fault, Apple.
Oh, and I'm a Verizon customer, so if a hacker brings down the AT&T network, this guy could careless.
Oh, and I'm a Verizon customer, so if a hacker brings down the AT&T network, this guy could careless.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Apple's Stupidity
First things first. Apple makes some beautiful, extremely innovating products. Their computers are slim, sexy and powerful. Their iPod's revolutionized the music industry. The iPhone and iPod Touch have created a touch screen trend which is forcing all competitors to play catch up. In this world of innovation, however, Apple has made some very poor decisions in my opinion.
The only place that Apple has gone right is with the iPod and iPod Touch. These devices are incredible. While the price is still relatively high compared to its MP3 player competitors, no other device offers the functionality and flexibility than that of the iPod. I own an iPod Touch and love it! My only beef with the Touch.....having to pay for the software updates! That is ridiculous in my opinion, but that's an argument for another day. Onward...
Mistake #1 -- Who is Apple targeting with their computers? Are they really trying to compete or are they going after a niche market. Like I mentioned previously, their computers are great, but who in the hell is pricing these things? I understand that Windows Vista is awful. I understand that PC's and Windows based products are more vulnerable to hacking, viruses and worms. However, for the average computer user in this country, Apple computers aren't even considered as an option. I could walk into Best Buy right now and buy a HP laptop with a dual-core processor, 4 GB of memory and 320 GB hard drive (among other things) for $585. Look at the laptops that Apple offers by comparison. Specifically, look at the price vs. features noted above. What person wants to spend an extra $1,000 to get a laptop with similar features? Certainly not your average American.
Mistake #2 -- I sure hope that AT&T is paying Apple LOTS of money for their exclusivity agreement surrounding the iPhone. This deal has been fabulous for AT&T, a great business decision, but what was Apple thinking with this one? T-Mobile customers have the fortunate ability to hack the iPhone to use it on their network. Customers of Sprint, Verizon and the rest of US cell service providers are stuck. Sure, the appeal of the iPhone has encouraged many people to switch carriers, but that's not always convenient. Contract cancellation fees are outrageous if you bow out early. If you can't wait for that 2-year contract to expire, you'll be paying 1) cancellation fees, 2) the high price for the iPhone itself and 3) the iPhone plan price (which for what you get, far exceeds any other plan).
I'm a very satisfied Verizon customer. Verizon has been easy to deal with , reliable and fair priced. I'm not interested in switching carriers despite my heavy interest in the iPhone. Nearly all my friends and family have Verizon so I have the enormous benefit of free Verizon to Verizon minutes/texting. It allows me to opt for a cheaper plan, saving me money. That would go away if I switched carriers. Granted, I'm only one customer, but I absolutely guarantee you that there are throngs of Verizon and Sprint customers who would already own an iPhone if it wasn't for Apple's bone-headed business decision to be AT&T exclusive.
Unless the price of Apple computers comes way down, then I won't be considering an Apple the next time I'm computer shopping. And I sure hope that when the iPhone exclusivity contract expires next year, Apple decides to expand their iPhone to other cell carriors. If not, LG and RIM will be my cell phone companies of choice.
It seems to me that Apple is extremely innovative and tech savvy. As far as business savvy, not so much.
The only place that Apple has gone right is with the iPod and iPod Touch. These devices are incredible. While the price is still relatively high compared to its MP3 player competitors, no other device offers the functionality and flexibility than that of the iPod. I own an iPod Touch and love it! My only beef with the Touch.....having to pay for the software updates! That is ridiculous in my opinion, but that's an argument for another day. Onward...
Mistake #1 -- Who is Apple targeting with their computers? Are they really trying to compete or are they going after a niche market. Like I mentioned previously, their computers are great, but who in the hell is pricing these things? I understand that Windows Vista is awful. I understand that PC's and Windows based products are more vulnerable to hacking, viruses and worms. However, for the average computer user in this country, Apple computers aren't even considered as an option. I could walk into Best Buy right now and buy a HP laptop with a dual-core processor, 4 GB of memory and 320 GB hard drive (among other things) for $585. Look at the laptops that Apple offers by comparison. Specifically, look at the price vs. features noted above. What person wants to spend an extra $1,000 to get a laptop with similar features? Certainly not your average American.
Mistake #2 -- I sure hope that AT&T is paying Apple LOTS of money for their exclusivity agreement surrounding the iPhone. This deal has been fabulous for AT&T, a great business decision, but what was Apple thinking with this one? T-Mobile customers have the fortunate ability to hack the iPhone to use it on their network. Customers of Sprint, Verizon and the rest of US cell service providers are stuck. Sure, the appeal of the iPhone has encouraged many people to switch carriers, but that's not always convenient. Contract cancellation fees are outrageous if you bow out early. If you can't wait for that 2-year contract to expire, you'll be paying 1) cancellation fees, 2) the high price for the iPhone itself and 3) the iPhone plan price (which for what you get, far exceeds any other plan).
I'm a very satisfied Verizon customer. Verizon has been easy to deal with , reliable and fair priced. I'm not interested in switching carriers despite my heavy interest in the iPhone. Nearly all my friends and family have Verizon so I have the enormous benefit of free Verizon to Verizon minutes/texting. It allows me to opt for a cheaper plan, saving me money. That would go away if I switched carriers. Granted, I'm only one customer, but I absolutely guarantee you that there are throngs of Verizon and Sprint customers who would already own an iPhone if it wasn't for Apple's bone-headed business decision to be AT&T exclusive.
Unless the price of Apple computers comes way down, then I won't be considering an Apple the next time I'm computer shopping. And I sure hope that when the iPhone exclusivity contract expires next year, Apple decides to expand their iPhone to other cell carriors. If not, LG and RIM will be my cell phone companies of choice.
It seems to me that Apple is extremely innovative and tech savvy. As far as business savvy, not so much.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Looking for a Party?
...Then head to my alma mater. The Princeton Review named Penn State the top party school in the country this year. I'm not sure whether to be proud, ashamed or a little of both. I'll say proud. My years at Penn State were the best of my life!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-07-27-princeton-best-colleges_N.htm?csp=34
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-07-27-princeton-best-colleges_N.htm?csp=34
Monday, July 27, 2009
Top Paying Majors
In the linked article from Yahoo! News, you'll see that my college major ranks in the top 15 in best paying jobs out of college. Not bad. As the article points out, all the top 15 fields have mathematics as the common thread. Only 3 of the 15 majors don't contain the word "engineering".
For all those kids out there, I know you may hate calculus. You may always ask when will I need this and all those common cliches. Well, this chart shows that mathematics is the key to several important, high demand fields. Focus on your math skills when you're young and you'll be paid cash dividends, literally.
Forget history. Forget liberal arts. Forget marketing. Learn to love integrals! :)
Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/college-education/article/107402/most-lucrative-college-degrees.html?mod=edu-collegeprep
For all those kids out there, I know you may hate calculus. You may always ask when will I need this and all those common cliches. Well, this chart shows that mathematics is the key to several important, high demand fields. Focus on your math skills when you're young and you'll be paid cash dividends, literally.
Forget history. Forget liberal arts. Forget marketing. Learn to love integrals! :)
Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/college-education/article/107402/most-lucrative-college-degrees.html?mod=edu-collegeprep
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Legalize Grass?
That's what is currently being proposed in California in an effort to bridge the massive $26.3 billion budget deficit. California tax officials estimate the bill's passage will generate approximately $1.4 billion for the state (I'm assuming annually). Personally, I don't see much of a problem in this proposal. I'll give you a couple reasons why I think this is a good proposal and why that $1.4 billion number is on the low side.
First and foremost, people call weed the gateway drug. In my opinion, the "gateway" to harder stuff is correlated to the caliber person you are buying from. Most drug dealers aren't exactly top rate citizens. Their goal is to make money by any means necessary. If you were able to buy pot from the local corner store, I say the likelihood of becoming associated with drug dealers, thus the likelihood or trying heavier drugs, is much lower. Therefore, more people may smoke grass as a result of this bill, but I believe less people will engage in other more addictive, more dangerous drugs.
That last statement moves into my next point. Some people may say, "Isn't more people smoking weed a bad thing?" While I'm not going to argue that it's a plus for society, I urge you to think about alcohol. Alcohol is available everywhere and is used much more frequently per capita than that of marijuana. Why do I make this point? Because the effects of cannabis are nothing compared to alcohol. Nothing. It's not as big a deal as some make it out to be.
My third point involves the direct income that legalizing the plant would create. In the linked article below from Yahoo! News, the plan is to sell 1 ounce for $50. Let's just say the current street value is much higher, leaving room for price increases. Although, I concede that price increases may not work based on the fundamental principle of economics, supply and demand. If pot is legalized, expect home grow operations to increase.
My final point is two fold. First, one has to consider the drug trade. The gang capital of the world is found in southern California. These gang members don't exactly have legitimate jobs. Their income comes from drug trafficking and dealing. Marijuana is always a cash crop for these gangs (just watch "Gangland" on the History Channel if you have doubts). Legalize pot and take away a huge source of income from some of the most violent and notorious gangs in the country. Furthermore, anyone following the news recently would know about the massive drug war going on in Mexico. The drug cartels are battling the authorities as the US and Mexican governments are trying to slow the drug trade. As I mentioned before, marijuana is a cash crop for the Mexican drug cartels. Legalization could help slow their operation. The second part of my final point involves the law enforcement costs associated with policing marijuana. This would be an indirect function of legalization. The state and local authorities will save millions of dollars as a result of the bill. Therefore, expect the combination of income and cost savings from the bill to far exceed the proposed $1.4 billion.
This is not an easy decision and I understand the hesitation. Legalizing pot would alter a long standing policy in the United States. However, I believe the benefits could outweigh the costs. Something to think about.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090716/ap_on_re_us/us_marijuana_taxes
First and foremost, people call weed the gateway drug. In my opinion, the "gateway" to harder stuff is correlated to the caliber person you are buying from. Most drug dealers aren't exactly top rate citizens. Their goal is to make money by any means necessary. If you were able to buy pot from the local corner store, I say the likelihood of becoming associated with drug dealers, thus the likelihood or trying heavier drugs, is much lower. Therefore, more people may smoke grass as a result of this bill, but I believe less people will engage in other more addictive, more dangerous drugs.
That last statement moves into my next point. Some people may say, "Isn't more people smoking weed a bad thing?" While I'm not going to argue that it's a plus for society, I urge you to think about alcohol. Alcohol is available everywhere and is used much more frequently per capita than that of marijuana. Why do I make this point? Because the effects of cannabis are nothing compared to alcohol. Nothing. It's not as big a deal as some make it out to be.
My third point involves the direct income that legalizing the plant would create. In the linked article below from Yahoo! News, the plan is to sell 1 ounce for $50. Let's just say the current street value is much higher, leaving room for price increases. Although, I concede that price increases may not work based on the fundamental principle of economics, supply and demand. If pot is legalized, expect home grow operations to increase.
My final point is two fold. First, one has to consider the drug trade. The gang capital of the world is found in southern California. These gang members don't exactly have legitimate jobs. Their income comes from drug trafficking and dealing. Marijuana is always a cash crop for these gangs (just watch "Gangland" on the History Channel if you have doubts). Legalize pot and take away a huge source of income from some of the most violent and notorious gangs in the country. Furthermore, anyone following the news recently would know about the massive drug war going on in Mexico. The drug cartels are battling the authorities as the US and Mexican governments are trying to slow the drug trade. As I mentioned before, marijuana is a cash crop for the Mexican drug cartels. Legalization could help slow their operation. The second part of my final point involves the law enforcement costs associated with policing marijuana. This would be an indirect function of legalization. The state and local authorities will save millions of dollars as a result of the bill. Therefore, expect the combination of income and cost savings from the bill to far exceed the proposed $1.4 billion.
This is not an easy decision and I understand the hesitation. Legalizing pot would alter a long standing policy in the United States. However, I believe the benefits could outweigh the costs. Something to think about.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090716/ap_on_re_us/us_marijuana_taxes
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Al-Qaida on the Run?
Sure seems like it after their number 2, Ayman al-Zawahri, called on Pakistanis to join the fight against the US. Sounds to me like Al-Qaida is a bit scared of advances by the coalition and the Pakistani military. I take al-Zawahri's recent audio message as a sign of weakness. That's the last thing al-Qaida needs as they fight the best military in the world.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090715/ap_on_re_mi_ea/al_zawahri_tape
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090715/ap_on_re_mi_ea/al_zawahri_tape
Friday, July 10, 2009
Would you Agree?
Would you agree that the state of America right now is frail? Would you agree that America's economic state is the worst since the Great Depression? Would you agree that we are fighting multiple wars right now while trying to repair the US image throughout the world? Would you agree that are so-called leaders need to focus on such issues? I believe all of the above is very reasonable. Would you agree? If so, continue reading. Otherwise, leave my blog and never return.
Why is Capitol Hill talking about Michael Jackson? Aren't there more pressing things to discuss? I get infuriated when I see stuff like this. Congress has no reason to discuss anything associated with Michael Jackson. None! How about you work on fixing the issues in this country before you talk about the death of one man who has absolutely no hand in what is happening.
Listen, I'm a fan of Michael Jackson, but the coverage on him over the past two weeks is out of control. It's so out of control that Congress is now talking about him. WHY!?! Please stop it. Now.
Why is Capitol Hill talking about Michael Jackson? Aren't there more pressing things to discuss? I get infuriated when I see stuff like this. Congress has no reason to discuss anything associated with Michael Jackson. None! How about you work on fixing the issues in this country before you talk about the death of one man who has absolutely no hand in what is happening.
Listen, I'm a fan of Michael Jackson, but the coverage on him over the past two weeks is out of control. It's so out of control that Congress is now talking about him. WHY!?! Please stop it. Now.
My Alma Mater Lifts for Life
The football team of my Alma Mater, the Penn State Nittany Lions, is lifting for life today in Happy Valley. This is a great philanthropic event that has gained momentum in recent years. PSU started the tradition 6 years ago by trying to raise money for cancer research at the university. Since then, PSU helped found an organization called Uplifting Athletes, which several other universities across the country have joined, including Boston College and Ohio State University. Uplifting Athletes works with college football programs to raise money for rare diseases.
Last year, Penn State's lift for life raised $70,000.
Here are a couple links to check out.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090710/ap_on_sp_co_ne/fbc_lifting_for_charity
http://www.upliftingathletes.org/
Last year, Penn State's lift for life raised $70,000.
Here are a couple links to check out.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090710/ap_on_sp_co_ne/fbc_lifting_for_charity
http://www.upliftingathletes.org/
Hypocracy at its Finest
I really wish Levi Johnston (the one who knocked up Bristol Palin) would just keep his mouth shut and go back to being a teenager. This guy has nothing to offer the world except the ability to stir up controversy, which is not needed. In the linked article from Yahoo! News, Johnston claims that former Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin resigned to cash in on the fame she has received in the past year. Where do you get that intel from Levi? If you don't have any evidence, why would you make such accusations? Get over yourself.
What's ironic about this whole situation is the fact he thinks Ms. Palin is trying to cash in on fame. Think about it. You sir, are the ultimate hypocrite.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090710/ap_on_re_us/us_palin_resignation
What's ironic about this whole situation is the fact he thinks Ms. Palin is trying to cash in on fame. Think about it. You sir, are the ultimate hypocrite.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090710/ap_on_re_us/us_palin_resignation
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Close Gitmo? Seriously Barack?
Read the story linked below...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/07/gitmo-inmate-leading-fight-helmand/
This pisses me off beyond belief. These terrorists were detained at Gitmo for this very reason. They have been and remain a threat not only to our troops, but to American security. I was just waiting to hear news like this when I learned that President Obama was planning to close Gitmo. Even though the above referenced enemy combatant was released on Bush's watch, make no mistake about it...this will not be the last time a story like this hits the news. Any enemy combatant detained and released will, you guessed it, join right back into the fight against this great country.
The closing of Gitmo is only going to increase stories of this nature.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/07/gitmo-inmate-leading-fight-helmand/
This pisses me off beyond belief. These terrorists were detained at Gitmo for this very reason. They have been and remain a threat not only to our troops, but to American security. I was just waiting to hear news like this when I learned that President Obama was planning to close Gitmo. Even though the above referenced enemy combatant was released on Bush's watch, make no mistake about it...this will not be the last time a story like this hits the news. Any enemy combatant detained and released will, you guessed it, join right back into the fight against this great country.
The closing of Gitmo is only going to increase stories of this nature.
What Are We Waiting For?
North Korea needs to be taught a lesson. I came into work this morning and saw news that several US and South Korea websites had been hacked and/or disrupted by what seems to be an organized cyber attack. Of course, North Korea is suspectedly behind the attack. If the allegations are true, this would just be the latest in a series of events committed by the North that warrants punishment. On Independence Day, the North test fired at least seven short range missiles off its eastern coast. That is in violation of several sanctions by the UN Security Council.
And speaking of the sanctions, who actually thinks they will work? What is the punishment? As far as I can tell, the only punishment I have seen is the UN Security Council "condemning" North Korea for their actions. Wow, condemn the North? That'll stop them. I understand that war and military action should be the last resort, but what is the world waiting for? Are they waiting for the North to sell weapons grade plutonium or enriched uranium to worldwide terrorists? Are they waiting for the North to bomb Japan or South Korea?
North Korea is making a mockery of the UN Security Council by defying every sanction they put on the table. In fact, the sanctions seem to be causing an increase in disruptive behavior by the rogue state. It's time for the world to take action. It's time for North Korea to be taught a lesson once and for all. It's time for the UN Security Council to grow a set and authorize stiffer penalties on the North for breaking international law. I only hope they figure this out before the North strikes first.
And speaking of the sanctions, who actually thinks they will work? What is the punishment? As far as I can tell, the only punishment I have seen is the UN Security Council "condemning" North Korea for their actions. Wow, condemn the North? That'll stop them. I understand that war and military action should be the last resort, but what is the world waiting for? Are they waiting for the North to sell weapons grade plutonium or enriched uranium to worldwide terrorists? Are they waiting for the North to bomb Japan or South Korea?
North Korea is making a mockery of the UN Security Council by defying every sanction they put on the table. In fact, the sanctions seem to be causing an increase in disruptive behavior by the rogue state. It's time for the world to take action. It's time for North Korea to be taught a lesson once and for all. It's time for the UN Security Council to grow a set and authorize stiffer penalties on the North for breaking international law. I only hope they figure this out before the North strikes first.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Hussein Lied About WMD's
Interesting story from Foxnews.com this morning. It goes into detail about how FBI interviews revealed that former Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein, lied about having weapons of mass destruction for fear of Iran. The reports state that Hussein feared Iran and claimed that US was not Iraq's enemy, he just opposed US policies.
I'm not quite sure what to think about this. If Hussein was speaking the truth, I have to wonder what he was thinking. He had two options -- 1) refuse to let UN weapons inspectors to come into Iraq, which ultimately caused the US and British invasion, or 2) allow the UN inspectors, prove you have no WMD's, stop the US invasion and "appear" weak to Iran . Seems to me he chose the hard road.
George Piro, the FBI agent who conducted the interviews of Hussein says, "The threat from Iran was the major factor as to why he did not allow the return of U.N. inspectors. Hussein stated he was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq's weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow U.N. inspectors back into Iraq." With all due respect to Hussein, but that is ridiculous. The most powerful military in the world threatens your country if you don't allow these UN inspectors to roam free and you essentially say that you're not worried about it. This is especially mind boggling considered Hussein claimed to be prepared seek a security agreement with the US to protect Iraq from Tehran's "fanatic" leaders. Again, I think you took the wrong path Saddam.
It's hard to know for sure if Hussein was speaking the full truth, especially when considering the options that he had. To fear Iran more than the United States is just crazy talk. I'd like to think that the US would have offered some assistance with Iran if Hussein would have cooperated with UN sanctions. Guess we'll never know.
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/02/fbi-interviews-hussein-lied-wmd-fear-iran/?test=latestnews
I'm not quite sure what to think about this. If Hussein was speaking the truth, I have to wonder what he was thinking. He had two options -- 1) refuse to let UN weapons inspectors to come into Iraq, which ultimately caused the US and British invasion, or 2) allow the UN inspectors, prove you have no WMD's, stop the US invasion and "appear" weak to Iran . Seems to me he chose the hard road.
George Piro, the FBI agent who conducted the interviews of Hussein says, "The threat from Iran was the major factor as to why he did not allow the return of U.N. inspectors. Hussein stated he was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq's weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow U.N. inspectors back into Iraq." With all due respect to Hussein, but that is ridiculous. The most powerful military in the world threatens your country if you don't allow these UN inspectors to roam free and you essentially say that you're not worried about it. This is especially mind boggling considered Hussein claimed to be prepared seek a security agreement with the US to protect Iraq from Tehran's "fanatic" leaders. Again, I think you took the wrong path Saddam.
It's hard to know for sure if Hussein was speaking the full truth, especially when considering the options that he had. To fear Iran more than the United States is just crazy talk. I'd like to think that the US would have offered some assistance with Iran if Hussein would have cooperated with UN sanctions. Guess we'll never know.
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/02/fbi-interviews-hussein-lied-wmd-fear-iran/?test=latestnews
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Hi! Billy Mays Here for...
It was announced on Sunday, June 28th, that the infamous pitchman Billy Mays had passed in his sleep. I was very sad to hear this news as the man was so full of the life and was only 50 years old. Several months ago, I don't know how much this news would have phased me. I used to see Billy on TV and thought nothing of it. I said to myself, here's this Billy Mays joker again selling another random product. I never really believed much in "As Seen on TV" products. I always thought, if they are so good, why aren't they sold in stores everywhere?
Well, until recently, I had no idea how ignorant I was. I'm an avid fan of the Discovery Channel and watch most of their shows. Therefore, it's no surprise that a couple of months back, I saw advertisements for an upcoming new show called 'Pitchmen' that featured Billy Mays and Anthony Sullivan. The show didn't exactly spark my interest like say, 'Mythbusters', but I wound up watching the pilot episode and got hooked. I had no idea what Billy and fellow pitchmen did until I saw this show. I was pleasantly surprised to see how much Billy and Sully tested the products they pitch. They heavily scrutinized the products and had members of the general public test the product before they put their name on it. Watching 'Pitchmen' also gave me an appreciation of why these products aren't in stores. These products are generally raw. They're new, and throwing them on a TV infomercial is the test to see if they can be successful. Will the public bite?
'Pitchmen' gave me an appreciation for not only the work that Billy Mays did, but also for the man that Billy Mays was. He was a hard worker and really cared for the inventors that he was trying to help become successful. He was and still is a legend in his industry. He will be missed. I'm glad I came across his show on the Discovery Channel before his passing and I will continue to watch it until it's removed from the air.
RIP Billy.
Good read: http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/29/news/companies/remembering_billy_mays.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009062916
Well, until recently, I had no idea how ignorant I was. I'm an avid fan of the Discovery Channel and watch most of their shows. Therefore, it's no surprise that a couple of months back, I saw advertisements for an upcoming new show called 'Pitchmen' that featured Billy Mays and Anthony Sullivan. The show didn't exactly spark my interest like say, 'Mythbusters', but I wound up watching the pilot episode and got hooked. I had no idea what Billy and fellow pitchmen did until I saw this show. I was pleasantly surprised to see how much Billy and Sully tested the products they pitch. They heavily scrutinized the products and had members of the general public test the product before they put their name on it. Watching 'Pitchmen' also gave me an appreciation of why these products aren't in stores. These products are generally raw. They're new, and throwing them on a TV infomercial is the test to see if they can be successful. Will the public bite?
'Pitchmen' gave me an appreciation for not only the work that Billy Mays did, but also for the man that Billy Mays was. He was a hard worker and really cared for the inventors that he was trying to help become successful. He was and still is a legend in his industry. He will be missed. I'm glad I came across his show on the Discovery Channel before his passing and I will continue to watch it until it's removed from the air.
RIP Billy.
Good read: http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/29/news/companies/remembering_billy_mays.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009062916
Monday, June 29, 2009
What is the North Thinking?
I don't know about any of you, but I have taken great interest in the drama surrounding North Korea in recent months. The country is obviously unstable under the leadership of psychopath Kim Jong Il. This guy is a lunatic. I can't possibly fathom what is going through this guy's head. Here's a background...
Jong Il has a history of ignoring sanctions from the United Nations. The only thing that has stopped the US and its allies from clamping down, is China. It's no secret that China has been North Korea's biggest ally in recent years. Therefore, you'd think that Jong Il and the rest of the North Korea crazies would try to preserve what little relationship they have with the Chinese. You'd think. Jong Il's recent long range missle and underground nuclear tests have angered nearly every country in the world. Both actions have been forbidden by UN sanctions, but Jong Il is pushing the envelope. Even China and Russia are now upset with North Korea. Stiffer sanctions have been implemented by the UN. Now, Jong Il is using everything around him as an excuse to build his nuclear arsenal.
Example: Reports have come about in recent weeks that around July 4th, North Korea will test fire a long range missle in the direction of Hawaii. The US, in response, activated missle defense systems in the Pacific and off the coast of Hawaii. Seems legitimate. North Korea's response --> "North Korea criticized the U.S. on Monday for positioning missile defense systems around Hawaii, calling the deployment part of a plot to attack the regime and saying it would bolster its nuclear arsenal in retaliation."
Here's another example that makes me wonder what Jong Il and North Korea are thinking. As a result of stiffer sanctions from the UN (a result stemming from North Korea's multiple violations of previous sanctions), North Korea threatened war and vowed to increase its nuclear arsenal. They have clearly angered everyone and are going up against all the world's super powers on these issues. I think Jong Il is testing our new president to see what he can get away with. I hope President Obama doesn't sit back and let this madman just get away it. Our allies in the region (Japan, South Korea) are very concerned with recent moves by North Korea. You can't help but think that the North is on a path to its own destruction.
Read this story from Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529348,00.html?test=latestnews
Jong Il has a history of ignoring sanctions from the United Nations. The only thing that has stopped the US and its allies from clamping down, is China. It's no secret that China has been North Korea's biggest ally in recent years. Therefore, you'd think that Jong Il and the rest of the North Korea crazies would try to preserve what little relationship they have with the Chinese. You'd think. Jong Il's recent long range missle and underground nuclear tests have angered nearly every country in the world. Both actions have been forbidden by UN sanctions, but Jong Il is pushing the envelope. Even China and Russia are now upset with North Korea. Stiffer sanctions have been implemented by the UN. Now, Jong Il is using everything around him as an excuse to build his nuclear arsenal.
Example: Reports have come about in recent weeks that around July 4th, North Korea will test fire a long range missle in the direction of Hawaii. The US, in response, activated missle defense systems in the Pacific and off the coast of Hawaii. Seems legitimate. North Korea's response --> "North Korea criticized the U.S. on Monday for positioning missile defense systems around Hawaii, calling the deployment part of a plot to attack the regime and saying it would bolster its nuclear arsenal in retaliation."
Here's another example that makes me wonder what Jong Il and North Korea are thinking. As a result of stiffer sanctions from the UN (a result stemming from North Korea's multiple violations of previous sanctions), North Korea threatened war and vowed to increase its nuclear arsenal. They have clearly angered everyone and are going up against all the world's super powers on these issues. I think Jong Il is testing our new president to see what he can get away with. I hope President Obama doesn't sit back and let this madman just get away it. Our allies in the region (Japan, South Korea) are very concerned with recent moves by North Korea. You can't help but think that the North is on a path to its own destruction.
Read this story from Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529348,00.html?test=latestnews
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Texting to Failure?
Kate Moore, of Des Moines, IA, recently won a texting competition. That's right...a texting competition. Some challenges included texting while blindfolded and texting while maneuvering through an obstacle course. Accuracy and speed is the name of the game. Although the Iowa teen took home a $50,000 price for winning the competition, you have to wonder where our youth is headed. Kate claims that she's not getting caught up in the digital world as she maintains good grades, but come on...
She claims to send 400 to 470 texts per day. Are you kidding me? Do you have any idea how many text messages that is? Let's crunch the numbers. Assuming she sleeps 8 hours every night, that means she's awake for 16 hours daily. Her 400 to 470 texts per day translates to 25 to 29 texts per hour. That means, on average, she is sending a text message every 2 to 2.4 minutes. Let me repeat that, she sends a text every 2 to 2.4 minutes that she is awake every day. Those mind boggling numbers don't even include the text messages that she receives. Think about those numbers for a minute and let it soak in. She is 15 years old! How do you ever pay attention to anything in school? How do you do anything for that matter?
The sad thing is....Kate is just one of millions of teens in this country with what should be labeled as a disease, an addiction, a problem. Despite her hefty reward, are her parents really proud? I certainly hope not. And speaking of the reward, what kind of message is LG (the competition sponsor) sending to this nation's children? Makes me sick.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090617/ap_on_re_us/us_texting_championship
She claims to send 400 to 470 texts per day. Are you kidding me? Do you have any idea how many text messages that is? Let's crunch the numbers. Assuming she sleeps 8 hours every night, that means she's awake for 16 hours daily. Her 400 to 470 texts per day translates to 25 to 29 texts per hour. That means, on average, she is sending a text message every 2 to 2.4 minutes. Let me repeat that, she sends a text every 2 to 2.4 minutes that she is awake every day. Those mind boggling numbers don't even include the text messages that she receives. Think about those numbers for a minute and let it soak in. She is 15 years old! How do you ever pay attention to anything in school? How do you do anything for that matter?
The sad thing is....Kate is just one of millions of teens in this country with what should be labeled as a disease, an addiction, a problem. Despite her hefty reward, are her parents really proud? I certainly hope not. And speaking of the reward, what kind of message is LG (the competition sponsor) sending to this nation's children? Makes me sick.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090617/ap_on_re_us/us_texting_championship
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Lack of Education or Laziness?
In the past year, ESPN.com has added a few dozen bloggers that report on specific sports divisions. This has been great as a dedicated Steelers and Penn State fan. I'm constantly checking out new posts on the AFC North and Big Ten blogs, respectively. Each blogger posts at least one mailbag, where casual readers like myself write in to the blogger, every week. It's a great way to argue with the blogger, bring up new ideas, get questions answered and get their "insider" take on a given issue.
While this is great and usually enjoyable to read other viewpoints, I must say that I have a major pet pieve with poor grammar. Why would you write to a blogger on ESPN.com with the writing level of a 1st grader? You have to assume that he/she will post your comment. Why make yourself look like a complete idiot to everyone that reads the blog? Even worse, these morons are generally trying to get a certain point across. How can you expect to be taken seriously when your grammar is consistent with someone who has yet to graduate elementary school?
In my opinion, laziness is no excuse. Write with reasonable spelling and grammar (so an educated man can make sense of it) or keep your comments to yourself. I for one won't give you much respect if you appear to have the IQ of a tennis ball. Case in point....Nick from the Bay Area. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/bigten/0-3-571/Big-Ten-mailblog.html
While this is great and usually enjoyable to read other viewpoints, I must say that I have a major pet pieve with poor grammar. Why would you write to a blogger on ESPN.com with the writing level of a 1st grader? You have to assume that he/she will post your comment. Why make yourself look like a complete idiot to everyone that reads the blog? Even worse, these morons are generally trying to get a certain point across. How can you expect to be taken seriously when your grammar is consistent with someone who has yet to graduate elementary school?
In my opinion, laziness is no excuse. Write with reasonable spelling and grammar (so an educated man can make sense of it) or keep your comments to yourself. I for one won't give you much respect if you appear to have the IQ of a tennis ball. Case in point....Nick from the Bay Area. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/bigten/0-3-571/Big-Ten-mailblog.html
Brett Farve - Tarnishing a Legacy
Now, I'm not a Green Bay Packers fan. I'm not a New York Jets fan. I'm not a Minnesota Vikings fan. I'm not a Brett Farve fan. However, I have always admired the guy as a successful NFL player who "gets" it. What do I mean by that? You never hear him talk about money. You never hear him bitching about his contract. The man just loves to play football and has played through more pain and injuries than one can count. That's admirable and rarely seen among today's professional athletes. Then again...
All admiration for the man that was Brett Farve has been balled up, trashed and burned. For the last 3 NFL seasons, what has been the dominant story in the offseason? Brett Farve...retiring or coming back? It wasn't so bad the first season as he was obviously struggling with whether or not to return (that love of the game thing again). But these past two seasons have not only taken it overboard, they have forever cast a dark cloud over his name.
What has happened the past two seasons? He officially retired. The Packers move on with Aaron Rogers. Brett wants to come back. The Packers don't want him. Brett thinks the Packers owe him a roster spot. Bickering ensues. He eventually signs with New York Jets. He retires again. Green Bay's division rival shows interest in Brett. He ponders a comeback. Can anyone say betrayal?
Personally, I'm sick of Brett Farve. I'm sick of turning on ESPN and seeing a story about Brett Farve. I'm sick of the stories and I'm sick of his bullshit. Brett, save what little is left of your legacy, go back to Mississippi and retire quietly. Leave (not protend to leave) the game of football to the next generation. The NFL and its fans are tired of you.
All admiration for the man that was Brett Farve has been balled up, trashed and burned. For the last 3 NFL seasons, what has been the dominant story in the offseason? Brett Farve...retiring or coming back? It wasn't so bad the first season as he was obviously struggling with whether or not to return (that love of the game thing again). But these past two seasons have not only taken it overboard, they have forever cast a dark cloud over his name.
What has happened the past two seasons? He officially retired. The Packers move on with Aaron Rogers. Brett wants to come back. The Packers don't want him. Brett thinks the Packers owe him a roster spot. Bickering ensues. He eventually signs with New York Jets. He retires again. Green Bay's division rival shows interest in Brett. He ponders a comeback. Can anyone say betrayal?
Personally, I'm sick of Brett Farve. I'm sick of turning on ESPN and seeing a story about Brett Farve. I'm sick of the stories and I'm sick of his bullshit. Brett, save what little is left of your legacy, go back to Mississippi and retire quietly. Leave (not protend to leave) the game of football to the next generation. The NFL and its fans are tired of you.
Monday, June 15, 2009
The Pilot
Ever find yourself reading an article and feel the need to respond? Ever have to urge to put in your two cents whether or not someone cares to hear it? Ever create a user name on a random website just post a comment?
The above fits me to a "T". I feel like every time I read something, I have something to say about it. Doesn't matter if I'm ignorant. Doesn't matter if I make valid points. I'm an opinionated person by nature and this is the best way to release the buildup.
So, welcome to my collection of randomness. Welcome to a place of opinion. Got a problem with what I write? Let me know...I'll be more than happy to argue.
The above fits me to a "T". I feel like every time I read something, I have something to say about it. Doesn't matter if I'm ignorant. Doesn't matter if I make valid points. I'm an opinionated person by nature and this is the best way to release the buildup.
So, welcome to my collection of randomness. Welcome to a place of opinion. Got a problem with what I write? Let me know...I'll be more than happy to argue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)